March 4, 2004
PSU's official response
A reader forwards along the canned response he got when he wrote to Graham Spanier protesting Nona Gerard's firing:
Thank you for your email. President Spanier is out of the country so I am responding on his behalf. I will be sure he sees your email. I can assure you that there is much, much more to this than you are reading in the papers. I hope you realize that the University is also limited in what it can say publicly about this case at this point in time, especially given that the faculty member has already indicated she plans to file a lawsuit. I can also assure you that the University's hearing process was followed explicitly at every step of the way.We have never taken away anyone's job for criticizing the quality of a program, and we never will. You should also know that when five members of the University community who heard over 40 hours of testimony in what was a quasi-legal proceeding would vote unanimously that the faculty member was guilty of grave misconduct, there is not just smoke but a lot of fire. For the faculty member to make public statements about due process not being served is understandable in her circumstances, but simply untrue.
What you have been reading in the press has simply not reflected the whole story.Steve MacCarthy
Vice President for University Relations
Brian Leiter's comments on this insinuatingly vague missive say pretty much all that needs to be said here. I would simply add that in the wake of this note, I would not be surprised to see Gerard add defamation to her list of legal claims against Penn State.
![[Critical Mass]](/archives/cmlogo.gif)