About Critical Mass [dot] Writing [dot] Reviews [dot] Contact
« previous entry | return home | next entry »

April 27, 2006 [feather]
Apples, oranges, and the goals of higher education

ACTA is urging Northern Kentucky University to prove its stated commitment to free speech--not to mention to make good on its legal obligation to same--by repealing its speech code. Meanwhile, NKU students are arguing that professors who teach courses on race and gender should have to pass an ideological litmus test:


Students at Northern Kentucky University have expressed feelings that the race and gender classes that most students take at one point or another may not be up to par.

Senior sociology major Akosua Favors believes the race and gender courses are inconsistent. She does not think the faculty who teach the classes have enough anti-racist training or credentials.

"We are asking that an effort is made to require qualifications and experience in the area of race and gender along with proof of anti-racist community empowerment/organizing," Favors said. "We are asking that the university is consistent with some form of anti-racist anti-discriminating trainings at least twice a year."

She said in many race and gender courses, students do not engage in class conversation because they feel they must speak for their entire racial group or gender.


At least according to this article, student concerns that NKU's race and gender classes "may not be up to par" are specifically political: The assumptions underwriting Favors' logic are that race and gender courses are not academic courses so much as courses in advocacy, that such courses may only legitimately advocate one position, and that faculty should have to prove their commitment to that position by agreeing to have their consciences molded and credentialed by mandatory sensitivity training. Favors seems unaware--or unconcerned--that she is demanding that NKU professors satisfy a political loyalty oath if they wish to teach about race or gender. But as websites such as this one show, "anti-racist" is not a transparently uncontroversial term, but rather a loaded, highly ideological marker of a specfically radical agenda.

If Favors' position is at all representative of NKU students generally, then NKU has a lot of work to do to educate its students in both the rights and responsibilities of public universities to protect free inquiry and in the principle of academic freedom. NKU could begin that process of educating by rolling back its speech code.

posted on April 27, 2006 7:39 AM