About Critical Mass [dot] Writing [dot] Reviews [dot] Contact
« previous entry | return home | next entry »

January 28, 2008 [feather]
Guilty pleasures

Just finished reading Khaled Hosseini's The Kite Runner, which I enjoyed both for its first novel-ness (I really, really like reading first novels, for the way they reveal a person in the act of sinking their imagination into a particular art form) and for its handling of guilt. The novel is billed as a tale of guilt and redemption--many reviews talk about it this way--but the redemption part is not really redemptive, and the point is that it can't be. Real guilt is forever.

You only know this if you are yourself guilty--or, more precisely, if you know that you are guilty. I think most of us go through life blithely unaware of the worst things we've done, perhaps even flattering ourselves that we're pretty blameless after all. Or, if we choose to take responsibility for any order of guilt, it's an abstraction, one we can easily deal with. Environmentalism is my favorite example of easy, indulgent guilt release. Drive a Prius! Buy a carbon offset! Hug a tree and turn off your lights! Or if you're Sheryl Crow, impose a hygienically unsound TP quota! Don't it feel fine!

Not that we shouldn't all be looking for ways to shrink our environmental footprints--but that taking steps like these doesn't really cost us much in terms of our souls. The Kite Runner deals with the real type of guilt, the sort that arises from a deed--or a neglect--that can never be undone, or compensated for, or recovered from, and that tends to be immensely personal and private, a matter whose depth is defined by the honesty of one's conscience. It's very powerful in that regard, not least because it takes for granted the idea that the active conscience--the one that can recognize when its owner does harm, and can fathom the depth and lastingness of that harm--really exists.

I'd love to hear from readers: Do you treasure certain works for their treatment of guilt? What are they? Do these works also imagine the possibility of redemption? Do you buy it? Please comment.

posted on January 28, 2008 6:27 PM




Trackback Pings:

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.erinoconnor.org/movabletype/mt-tb.cgi/1388






Comments:

William S. Burroughs, who shot his wife in the head and killed her during a drunken game of "William Tell" was once asked by a journalist if there was anything in his life he regretted. He quoted the following lines from a poem by Edward Arlington Robinson in reply:
"There are mistakes too monstrous for remorse to tamper or to dally with." Say what you will about Burroughs, but he knew something about guilt: there is no real redemption.

Posted by: dossier at January 29, 2008 10:28 AM



That's just a despicable position to take. You imply that the only significant grounds for recompense are actions for which one can find full personal responsibility and you sneer at any attempt to promote reform or reparation on a larger scale as superficial self-condolence. That kind of fraudulent economy leaves no place for collective action to repair harm committed by others, especially others who are no longer living. I'm sure you're quite aware of the effective moral and political armor against real participatory responsibility that such a position provides for you and your prosperous allies. It's clear that you also acknowledge no kind of prejudice except that which is motivated by personal animus and even that you tend to defend as a form of free speech. That snide insistence upon "true" guilt as an authenticating subject position is simple moral relativism -- something I believe you are more than ready to decry when it suits you. There's no need to invoke guilt when critiquing progressive impulses. That gesture is nothing more than a means to deflect the accusation that you who feel content to let injustice persist and thrive are complacent and even hateful in your refusal to accept that you might very easily consent to reform and reparation, even participate were you not so intent on keeping things the way they are.

Posted by: Derek Catermole at January 29, 2008 12:03 PM



Flannery O'Connor's short story "Everything That Rises Must Converge" is one of the most powerful presentations of guilt that I have ever read. The betrayal by arrogant Julian of his mother Mrs. Chestny, a betrayal that contributes immediately and potently to her death when she desperately needs his help, promises a life of "guilt and sorrow" that can never end. Unlike an equally potent portrayal in "The Artificial Nigger," traitor (the grandfather, Mr. Head) and victim (his grandson Nelson) live. They live to grow in understanding, an understanding that promises compassion and even the possibility of love. Any of us who have visited abominable betrayal upon someone close, or who have been thus betrayed, can find in O'Connor, if not redemption, at least clarity of vision and reconciliation to the albatross we must bear.

Posted by: John C. Bonnell at January 29, 2008 8:23 PM



The Scarlet Letter is a classic exploration of the effect of guilt on the human psyche, though I wouldn't take it as a life lesson. Flagellating yourself in the privacy of your home on a nightly basis as payment for past wrongs is probably not the must constructive method of seeking personal redemption.

Posted by: Keely H. at February 1, 2008 1:51 PM





Post a comment:




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)