About Critical Mass [dot] Writing [dot] Reviews [dot] Contact
« previous entry | return home | next entry »

February 28, 2008 [feather]
Eliminating the middle man

Alumni give billions to higher ed every year--but it's often unclear where exactly their money goes. And, as debates about higher ed's effectiveness intensify, savvy alumni are increasingly interested in controlling where their giving goes.

Over at the Chronicle of Higher Ed's Face Value blog, Erin Strout reports on a Williams alum who is trying to convince Williams to allow alumni to work directly with student groups whose missions they wish to support:


Three years ago a student group at Williams College, Williams Students Online, set up a PayPal account to collect donations for a pizza fund. David Kane, a 1988 alumnus, bought $200 worth.

"It made me happy because I got to contribute something small but tangible to a student group that I like and respect," he writes in an essay in The Williams Record.

Now Mr. Kane wonder aloud why he and other alumni can't have such interactions with students more regularly. "Because College bureaucrats trust neither students nor alumni to behave responsibly, at least as far as fund-raising is concerned," he surmises. "The College wants to control the money. It does not trust students to ask for reasonable things. It does not trust alumni to refrain from funding unreasonable requests. It worries that student awkwardness will harm its relationships with alumni donors."

Mr. Kane is asking college officials to consider setting up a Web site modeled on DonorsChoose.org, an organization that allows public-school teachers to enter donation requests, and donors to choose which requests to support. College students could enter projects they'd like to start, and alumni could choose to donate to them.

"My pizza buying should not mark the high point of direct alumni donations to student groups," he writes. "It should be just the start."


Obviously this idea would only address certain small-scale aspects of alumni giving--this is not the sort of giving that pays for a building, launches a center, or endows a chair. But for what it is, it looks very ingenious, enterprising, and useful. It's also very free in ways that I can well imagine might worry college officials of a certain stripe. I'd love to know what readers think. Do you see problems? Possibilities? Broader applications?


posted on February 28, 2008 3:08 PM




Trackback Pings:

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.erinoconnor.org/movabletype/mt-tb.cgi/1413






Comments:

I think university administrations have a legitimate oversight responsibility with respect to the way money gets donated to their institutions. Two-hundred bucks for pizza does not pose a problem, but if large sums of cash were to be given directly to some groups or units, it might give them coercive power over a department, a college, or the school itself. I think it best to stick with the foundation model, but maybe the charges that foundations assess for managing the money donated should be decreased or abolished in some cases.

I'm a loyal alumnus and I donate to specific things, like the department I earned my degree from, but I give the most to the university's general fund, so it can be used as the admin. sees fit. The school prefers such donations, because a great deal of money donated, especially by wealthy patrons, is earmarked for particular uses. Thus, though there is a lot of money in the pot, the school cannot use it for key concerns or putting out fires. I may change the way I donate in the future if the school keeps wasting time and money on constructing bathrooms for the transgenderd, social justice institutes, and other highly important academic endeavors. But for now, I'm going to be true to my school and hope that it can remain true to itself.

Posted by: TG at February 29, 2008 10:05 AM





Post a comment:




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)