About Critical Mass [dot] Writing [dot] Reviews [dot] Contact
« previous entry | return home | next entry »

June 18, 2008 [feather]
Civics quiz

To become a U.S. citizen, you have to pass a test on U.S. history and civics. That test is currently being redesigned. Here are some questions from the new version, which will be launched this October:

1. How many amendments does the Constitution have?


2. What stops one branch of government from becoming too powerful?


3. The House of Representatives has how many voting members?


4. There are four amendments to the Constitution about who can vote. Describe one of them.


5. What are two rights only for United States citizens?


6. The Federalist Papers supported the passage of the U.S. Constitution. Name one of the
writers.


7. What territory did the United States buy from France in 1803?


8. Who was President during World War I?


9. Name one U.S. territory.


10. Why does the flag have 13 stripes?


The answers are here. How did you do?

If you are in a test-taking mood, take the exam ACTA administered to elite college seniors several years ago (see Appendix A). The majority flunked.

Hat tip: Thanks to Cliopatria for the link to the naturalization questions.

posted on June 18, 2008 8:50 AM




Trackback Pings:

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.erinoconnor.org/movabletype/mt-tb.cgi/1484






Comments:

I believe the provided answers to number 5 are in error. Extension of suffrage to resident aliens is at the discretion of state governments; it is just that no state government has allowed alien suffrage since 1926[?]. (For purposes of apportionment of U.S. representatives, the number of male citizens is the index used). They also seem to suggest that resident aliens are debarred from the military and the civil service. I think they are simply wrong about that. The federal Constitution does require that the President and members of Congress be citizens, but the qualifications for lesser offices are specified in state constitutions (which may or may not vary on this point).

The notion that separation of powers and 'checks-and-balances' prevent the undue aggrandizement of one branch at the expense of another is a commonplace in discussions of this sort but has been discredited in the last fifty years as the appellate judiciary has grown increasingly arrogant. The Congress could impeach judges and shut down particular courts by refusing to appropriate the money to run them and the executive could ignore particularly egregious judicial decrees, but this simply does not happen.

Posted by: Art Deco at June 18, 2008 3:25 PM





Post a comment:




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)