February 5, 2009
Do as I say, not as I spell
The London Telegraph reports on England's schools minister--whose blog is a striking record of his own inattention to spelling and editing:
The Labour MP's website was also found to contain typing errors and grammatical oversights.The mispellings of Mr Knight, who was educated at Cambridge University, include "maintainence", "convicned", "curently", "similiar", "foce", "pernsioners", "reccess" and "archeaological".
Mr Knight, who is responsible for raising education standards, also clearly has problems with the "i before e, except after c" spelling rule taught to primary school pupils.
He spelled "achieving" and "received" incorrectly.
Mr Knight, 43, gives his opinions on local and national issues regularly on his website, which reveals he attended the fee-paying Eltham College, in Mottingham, south east London.
He went on to study geography, and social and political sciences at Fitzwilliam College, Cambridge, from 1984 to 1987.
Mr Knight, MP for Dorset South, said: "When I was at school the teachers told me to always check my work. While my spelling is generally pretty good, I need to focus more on checking."
Rob Wilson, the Conservative education spokesman, said: "He will be disappointed with his efforts in class but I'm sure he'll make every effort to improve now teacher has noticed he's falling behind."
Words the education minister got wrong:
maintainence (maintenance)
convicned (convinced)
curently (currently)
similiar (similar)
foce (force)
pernsioners (pensioners)
reccess (recess)
archeaological (archeological)
acheiving (achieving)
receieved (received)
The BBC makes additional note of Knight's iffy grammar and syntax:
In one entry, Mr Knight talks of his pride at steering through Parliament the legislation raising the education or training age to 18.
He says: "This is something that Winston Churchill first proposed 100 years when he put forward the idea of raising the age to 17, then another attempt to raise the leaving age after the First and Second World Wars."Later he writes: "While there has been a lot going on with respect to problems regarding the Educational Maintainence Allowance and tidying up after the problems with the SATs, there is also a lot of positive things going on in our schools."
"The new diplomas are being taught very successful ...".
[...]
The heading of Mr Knight's blog includes the verb "to feedback".
Corrections were being made to old blog entries on the website on Thursday morning.
Oh, the pain.
There's not being able to spell, punctuate, edit -- and there's not caring whether your spelling, grammar, and typing are correct. They are two things, but they overlap quite a bit, not least because if you are a crap speller (or a crap punctuator, or a crap crafter of syntax), you won't be able to see your own mistakes, and you won't necessarily appreciate the difference between what you write and what's correct.
It's hard to get people who don't take language seriously to start doing it. And it doesn't help that students aren't reliably held to account by their teachers. There is one thing that I found works quite well, though, to help students grasp the nature of the embarrassment and judgment they can unwittingly incur if they don't attend to those details. They pretty much get it if you say that not being able to tell if you are producing correct prose is the linguistic equivalent of walking around with your fly down--and not having the capacity to identify or correct the problem.
Aside: at the boarding school where I spent the 2004-05 year, the head of school was quite blunt about why they did nothing to try to improve students' grammar and spelling, arguing (erroneously) that such things just turn kids off reading and school. He was surprised--and I think perhaps a bit offended--when my colleague and I introduced grammar lessons into our English and writing courses. The students loved it, and asked for more. Then we introduced SAT verbal prep classes on Wednesday nights--which also included plenty of grammar study, along with vocabulary lessons. The kids brought snacks, they filled the room, they learned a lot, and we all had a blast, especially when it came to the vocabulary flash cards. I kid you not. Kids are fun. And so is learning. So ... good times were had by all.
Trackback Pings:
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.erinoconnor.org/movabletype/mt-tb.cgi/1591
Comments:
"arguing (erroneously) that such things just turn kids off reading and school"...I think many school administrators deal heavily in projection, assuming that things *they* don't like, or didn't like in their own school days, are also disliked by the vast majority of kids. But I suspect that people who choose to be K-12 school administrators are far from a random sample of personalities.
I'm a grammar nerd, and I'm excited that my high school is beginning to integrate rigorously an education in descriptive, as well as prescriptive, grammar. Up to now, we've largely been working remedially, student by student. But now we're trying to work with what C. Beth Burch calls in her excellent textbook, *Rhetorical Grammar* -- that is, the connections between the shape of a sentence and its effects. I love the "fly down" metaphor. I also find, though, that my students understand that in order to shape language effectively (and analyze well-shaped language) they have to understand the names and parts and structures of the language. It's not just about the unzipped fly on the jeans but about the stunning ensemble of jeans and shoes and shirt and belt and socks. (I love how Barthes talks about the "grammar" of fashion -- it's a great way into the grammar of grammar; basic semiotics makes sense to teenagers.)
I also find that high achieving (or is it "acheiving"?) students *love* SAT prep. They love to be in school situations that are like quiz games -- the speed, the rote skills, the security of a right or wrong answer. Arguing about why Telemakhos insists on his father's death throughout Book One of the *Odyssey* drives many of them mad: "What is the right answer?" they demand to know. But knowing that "poly" means "many" makes them feel great (and is still important for Book One, right?).
Oddly enough, I too teach SAT verbal prep on Wednesdays.
not least because if you are a crap speller (or a crap punctuator, or a crap crafter of syntax), you won't be able to see your own mistakes, and you won't necessarily appreciate the difference between what you write and what's correct.
While that is very true, could he not at least have used the automatic spelling checker available? Firefox checks the spelling on each of my posts for me.
I'll note that my high school advanced English class had the same result when the teacher brought up grammar. She assumed that all of us had been taught more than enough of it and was surprised at the positive feedback she got and the push the students provided for getting more grammar instruction.
Post a comment:
![[Critical Mass]](/archives/cmlogo.gif)