![[comment image]](http://www.erinoconnor.org/archives/commentimage.gif)
Entry: Move over, Damien Hirst
It appears she didn't really do these appalling things. Thank God.
Posted by Laura(southernxyl) at April 17, 2008 5:55 PM
"The "fabricators," or donors, of the sperm were not paid for their services, but..."
But, of course, would've still been legally responsible for their mutual offspring if she'd decided in the middle of her ridiculous "project" that she'd changed her mind.
"She said she was not concerned about any medical effects the forced miscarriages may have had on her body."
Then, again, she's either lying, or breathtakingly ignorant.
"The abortifacient drugs she took were legal and herbal, she said,"
If they're herbal, she's taking her life into her hands, as with most BS "herbal supplements." If they're FDA-regulated, they're NOT approved for repeated use over such a short timeframe. If she makes herself sterile, or dies of a cervical hemorrhage, I assume she (or her estate) will be OK with dying for her "art," and shoulder complete responsibility? Or will they then decide to start looking for someone else to blame, i.e., sue?
Maybe I'm jaded by being surrounded mostly by people of the same generation as her who I spend most of the day prosecuting, but it's the same omnipresent perception of entitlement: "I can do whatever I want without responsibility, the world owes me not only success but non-stop stimulation, and if I fuck up, I'm allowed an unlimited number of excuses." Generation Y or Z at its coddled best.
Posted by Dave J at April 17, 2008 7:10 PM